Pre-Payment Provider-Specific Probe Results for Echocardiography, Transthoracic, Real-Time with Image Documentation from July Through September 2022

Published 02/09/2023

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) process for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code 93306: Echocardiography, Transthoracic, Real-Time with Image Documentation, effective September 1, 2021. This edit was set in Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee. The Jurisdiction J probe reviews with edit effectiveness performed July through September 2022, are presented here.

Probe One

Number of Providers with Edit Effectiveness Performed

Providers Compliant Completed/Removed After Probe 1 Edits

Providers Non-Compliant Progressing to TPE Probe 2

Providers Non-Compliant/Removed for Other Reason

37

12

25

0

Findings by State
Palmetto GBA’s overview of results by state for providers who have had edit effectiveness performed for Probe 1 TPE review. 

State

Number of Providers with Edit Effectiveness Performed

Providers Compliant Completed/Removed After Probe 1

Providers Non-Compliant Progressing to TPE Probe 2

Providers Non-Compliant/Removed for Other Reason

Ala.

12

5

7

0

Ga.

15

2

13

0

Tenn.

10

5

5

0

 

State

Number of Claims with Edit Effectiveness Performed

Number of Claims Denied

Overall Claim Denial Rate Per State

Ala.

480

223

46%

Ga.

600

300

50%

Tenn.

400

143

36%

 

State

Total Dollars Reviewed

Total Dollars Denied

Overall Charge Denial Rate Per State

Ala.

$69,200.31

$33,209.34

48%

Ga.

$97,585.19

$50,406.30

52%

Tenn.

$51,413.20

$18,048.47

35%

Risk Category
Risk Category is defined based on end of Probe 1 provider error rates. The categories are defined as:

Risk Category Error Rate
Minor 0–20%
Major 21—100%

 Risk Category for Echocardiography, Transthoracic, Real-Time with Image Documentation

Top Denial Reasons 

Percent of Total Denials

Denial Code

Denial Description

Number of Occurrences

26%

NODOC

Documentation Requested for This Date of Service Was Not Received or Was Incomplete; Therefore, We Are Unable to Make a Reasonable and Necessary Determination as Defined Under Section 1862(a) (1) (A) of the ACT for the Service Billed and This Service Has Been Denied

25

24%

NOTML

Per Applicable LCD, Payer Deems the Information Submitted Does Not Support the Medical Necessity of the Services Billed

23

19%

WRONG

Documentation Received Contains an Incorrect, Incomplete or Illegible Patient Identification or Date of Service

18

18%

BILER

Claim Billed in Error per Provider

17

11%

DNSRP

Documentation Not Signed by the Rendering Provider

10

Denial Reasons and Prevention Recommendations

NODOC — Documentation Requested for This Date of Service Was Not Received or Was Incomplete; Therefore, We Are Unable to Make a Reasonable and Necessary Determination as Defined Under the Social Security Act § 1862(a) (1) (A) for the Service Billed and This Service Has Been Denied

  • Submit all documentation related to the services billed within 45 days of the date on the Additional Documentation Request (ADR) letter
  • Review documentation prior to submission to ensure that the documentation is complete and that all dates of service requested are included
  • Include any additional information pertinent to the date of service requested to support the services billed. For example, original chart notes, diagnostic, radiological or laboratory results.
  • For claims denied with a M127 or N29 code listed on the remittance advice, be sure to submit all documentation for all dates of service on that claim with a reopen/redetermination request form by fax to JM Part B (803) 699–2427, JJ Part B (803) 870–0139, or RRB Appeals (803) 462–2218
     

NOTML — Per Applicable LCD, Payer Deems the Information Submitted Does Not Support the Medical Necessity of the Services Billed

  • Ensure that all documentation to support medical necessity of the service billed is submitted for review. This includes original chart notes and any diagnostic, radiological or laboratory results
  • Verify that documentation to support the level of service billed is included. Please refer to our website for documentation requirements
     

WRONG — Documentation Received Contains an Incorrect, Incomplete or Illegible Patient Identification or Date of Service

  • Review all documentation prior to submission to ensure that it is for the correct patient and date of service
  • Ensure that patient identifiers are legible and complete
  • Ensure that the complete date of service is clearly and legibly noted on all documentation
  • Prior to billing claims, review the information to determine that the correct patient identifier and the correct date of service are listed in the appropriate field
     

BILER — Claim Billed in Error per Provider

  • Prior to billing claims, review the information to determine that the correct information is listed in the appropriate fields
  • For all claims previously billed and denied by medical review, do not resubmit the claims. If you disagree with the decision from Medical Review, you must submit the appropriate documentation with a completed redetermination request form to the Appeals Department. This information can be sent by fax to JM Part B Appeals (803) 699–2427, JJ Part B Appeals (803) 870–0139, or RRB Appeals (803) 462–2218.
  • If documentation indicates that both a nonphysician practitioner (NPP) and a physician performed the service, and the claim is billed under the physician’s National Provider Identifier (NPI), the billing physician must sign the record. Additionally, the documentation must include a statement that the billing provider had face-to-face contact with the patient and performed a substantive portion of the Evaluation and Management (E/M) visit. (A substantive portion of the E/M visit includes at least one of the three key components: history, exam, or medical decision-making.)
  • If documentation occurs in a teaching environment, review the documentation to ensure that the billing provider has provided a teaching attestation and a signature
     

DNSRP — Documentation Not Signed by the Rendering Provider

Education
Palmetto GBA offers providers selected for TPE an individualized education session to discuss each claim denial. This is an opportunity to learn how to identify and correct claim errors. A variety of education methods are offered such as webinar sessions, web-based presentations, or teleconferences. Other education methods may also be available. Providers do not have to be selected for TPE to request education. If education is desired, please complete the Education Request form (PDF).

Next Steps
Providers found to be non-compliant (major risk category/denial rate of 21–100 percent) at the completion of TPE Probe 1 will advance to Probe 2, and providers found to be non-compliant (major risk category/denial rate of 21–100 percent) at the completion of TPE Probe 2 will advance to Probe 3 of TPE after at least 45 days from completing the 1:1 post-probe education call date. 


Was this article helpful?